AMLCompliant vs NameScan
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
AMLCompliant
Document / template pack
- Entry price
- $497.00
- Evidence
- 87%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- overseas
NameScan
Verification layer
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 6%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose AMLCompliant when...
Nothing separates them here: every capability agreed for AMLCompliant is at least established for NameScan too.
Choose NameScan when...
Nothing separates them here: every capability agreed for NameScan is at least established for AMLCompliant too.
Biggest differences
| Field | AMLCompliant | NameScan |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | No | Not established |
| Risk assessment | No | Not established |
| Staff training | No | Not established |
| Customer due diligence | No | Not established |
| Beneficial ownership and control | No | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | No | Not established |
| Electronic identity verification | No | Not established |
| Biometric liveness and face match | No | Not established |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | No | Not established |
| PEP and sanctions screening | No | Not established |
| Adverse media screening | No | Not established |
| Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) | No | Partial |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | No | Not established |
| AUSTRAC SMR XML export | No | Not established |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation Not agreed Not obtained
- Program maintenance and review Not obtained Not obtained
- Risk assessment Not agreed Not obtained
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Not obtained Not obtained
- Staff training Not agreed Not obtained
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence Not agreed Not obtained
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Not obtained Not obtained
- Beneficial ownership and control Not agreed Not obtained
- Enhanced due diligence Not agreed Not obtained
- Reliance arrangements Not obtained Not obtained
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification Not agreed Not obtained
- Biometric liveness and face match Not agreed Not obtained
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Not agreed Not obtained
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening Not agreed Not obtained
- Adverse media screening Not agreed Not obtained
- Ongoing customer monitoring Not agreed Not agreed
- Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) Not agreed Queried
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow Not agreed Not obtained
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Not agreed Not obtained
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Not agreed Not obtained
- Threshold transaction reporting Not agreed Not obtained
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export Not agreed Not obtained
- Immutable audit log Not agreed Not obtained
- API access Not agreed Not obtained
Tranche 2 operations
- Risk assessed per designated service Queried Not obtained
- Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk Queried Not obtained
- Program obligations calendar Queried Not obtained
- Versioned AML program and CDD records Queried Not obtained
- Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recorded Queried Not obtained
- Expired document alerts Not agreed Not obtained
- Reliance CDD requests sent and received Queried Not obtained
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 8 October 2026. Source records: AMLCompliant on AML Directory · NameScan on AML Directory