AML Guard vs StackGo IdentityCheck
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
Product A
AML Guard
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- $75.00/mo
- Evidence
- 71%
- Marketed to
- Real estate, Conveyancing, Legal, Accounting
- Data residency
- mixed
Product B
StackGo IdentityCheck
Verification layer
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 71%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose AML Guard when...
- AML/CTF program creation is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Risk assessment is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Staff training is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Customer due diligence is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Know-your-business (entity checks) is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
Choose StackGo IdentityCheck when...
- Biometric liveness and face match is verified — AML Guard has not established it.
Where both fit
Electronic identity verificationPEP and sanctions screening
Biggest differences
| Field | AML Guard | StackGo IdentityCheck |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | Verified | No |
| Risk assessment | Verified | No |
| Independent evaluation support (s84) | No | Not established |
| Staff training | Verified | No |
| Customer due diligence | Verified | No |
| Know-your-business (entity checks) | Verified | Not established |
| Beneficial ownership and control | Verified | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | Not established | No |
| Biometric liveness and face match | Not established | Verified |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | Not established | No |
| Adverse media screening | Verified | Not established |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | Verified | No |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | Verified | No |
| Tipping-off controls (s123) | Verified | No |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation Verified No
- Program maintenance and review Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Risk assessment Verified No
- Independent evaluation support (s84) No Needs confirmation
- Staff training Verified No
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence Verified No
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Verified Needs confirmation
- Beneficial ownership and control Verified Needs confirmation
- Enhanced due diligence Needs confirmation No
- Reliance arrangements Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification Verified Verified
- Biometric liveness and face match Needs confirmation Verified
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Needs confirmation No
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening Verified Verified
- Adverse media screening Verified Needs confirmation
- Ongoing customer monitoring Verified No
- Transaction monitoring No No
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow Verified No
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export No No
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Verified No
- Threshold transaction reporting Partial No
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export Needs confirmation No
- Immutable audit log Verified No
- API access Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewEnhanced due diligenceReliance arrangementsBiometric liveness and face matchDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessEvidence pack exportAPI accessIndependent evaluation support (s84)
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 25 August 2026. Source records: AML Guard on AML Directory · StackGo IdentityCheck on AML Directory