AMLHUB vs StackGo IdentityCheck
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
Product A
AMLHUB
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 58%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal
- Data residency
- mixed
Product B
StackGo IdentityCheck
Verification layer
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 71%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose AMLHUB when...
- Risk assessment is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Independent evaluation support (s84) is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Staff training is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Customer due diligence is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Enhanced due diligence is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
Choose StackGo IdentityCheck when...
- Biometric liveness and face match is verified — AMLHUB has not established it.
Where both fit
Electronic identity verificationPEP and sanctions screening
Biggest differences
| Field | AMLHUB | StackGo IdentityCheck |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | Partial | No |
| Risk assessment | Verified | No |
| Independent evaluation support (s84) | Verified | Not established |
| Staff training | Verified | No |
| Customer due diligence | Verified | No |
| Beneficial ownership and control | Partial | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | Verified | No |
| Biometric liveness and face match | Not established | Verified |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | Not established | No |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | Verified | No |
| Transaction monitoring | Partial | No |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | Partial | No |
| AUSTRAC SMR XML export | Not established | No |
| Tipping-off controls (s123) | Not established | No |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation Partial No
- Program maintenance and review Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Risk assessment Verified No
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Verified Needs confirmation
- Staff training Verified No
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence Verified No
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Beneficial ownership and control Partial Needs confirmation
- Enhanced due diligence Verified No
- Reliance arrangements Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification Verified Verified
- Biometric liveness and face match Needs confirmation Verified
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Needs confirmation No
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening Verified Verified
- Adverse media screening Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Ongoing customer monitoring Verified No
- Transaction monitoring Partial No
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow Partial No
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Needs confirmation No
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Needs confirmation No
- Threshold transaction reporting Partial No
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export Partial No
- Immutable audit log Needs confirmation No
- API access Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewKnow-your-business (entity checks)Reliance arrangementsBiometric liveness and face matchDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessAdverse media screeningAUSTRAC SMR XML exportTipping-off controls (s123)
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 25 August 2026. Source records: AMLHUB on AML Directory · StackGo IdentityCheck on AML Directory