StackGo IdentityCheck vs TrustSoft
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
Product A
StackGo IdentityCheck
Verification layer
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 71%
- Marketed to
- Not established
- Data residency
- Not established
Product B
TrustSoft
AML module in another product
- Entry price
- $99.00/mo
- Evidence
- 71%
- Marketed to
- Accounting
- Data residency
- australia
Choose StackGo IdentityCheck when...
No capability is verified for StackGo IdentityCheck that is not also established for TrustSoft.
Choose TrustSoft when...
- AML/CTF program creation is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Program maintenance and review is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Risk assessment is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Staff training is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
- Customer due diligence is verified — StackGo IdentityCheck has not established it.
Where both fit
Electronic identity verificationBiometric liveness and face matchPEP and sanctions screening
Biggest differences
| Field | StackGo IdentityCheck | TrustSoft |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | No | Verified |
| Program maintenance and review | Not established | Verified |
| Risk assessment | No | Verified |
| Staff training | No | Verified |
| Customer due diligence | No | Verified |
| Know-your-business (entity checks) | Not established | Verified |
| Beneficial ownership and control | Not established | Verified |
| Enhanced due diligence | No | Verified |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | No | Verified |
| Adverse media screening | Not established | Verified |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | No | Not established |
| Transaction monitoring | No | Verified |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | No | Verified |
| AUSTRAC SMR XML export | No | Not established |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation No Verified
- Program maintenance and review Needs confirmation Verified
- Risk assessment No Verified
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Staff training No Verified
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence No Verified
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Needs confirmation Verified
- Beneficial ownership and control Needs confirmation Verified
- Enhanced due diligence No Verified
- Reliance arrangements Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification Verified Verified
- Biometric liveness and face match Verified Verified
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access No Verified
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening Verified Verified
- Adverse media screening Needs confirmation Verified
- Ongoing customer monitoring No Needs confirmation
- Transaction monitoring No Verified
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow No Verified
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export No Needs confirmation
- Tipping-off controls (s123) No Needs confirmation
- Threshold transaction reporting No Verified
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export No Verified
- Immutable audit log No Needs confirmation
- API access Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewIndependent evaluation support (s84)Know-your-business (entity checks)Beneficial ownership and controlReliance arrangementsAdverse media screeningAPI accessOngoing customer monitoring
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 25 August 2026. Source records: StackGo IdentityCheck on AML Directory · TrustSoft on AML Directory