ClearAML
Hosted software intended to carry the obligation lifecycle end to end — program, CDD, screening, reporting and records in one place.
Best considered by: firms looking for platform coverage across Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing.
Statement of record
ClearAML is a platform marketed to Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing. Established capabilities include SMR XML export, CDD, KYB / entity checks, Beneficial ownership, PEP & sanctions, Ongoing monitoring, Risk assessment, eID verification. 8 tracked fields are not established.
- Verification charged per check on all tiers; only Professional and above include a monthly credit
- Entry pricing
- $49.00
- per month as published, ex GST · inc GST $53.90
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing
- Publicly marketed sectors — not a legal scope statement.
- Data stored in
- Australia
- Data processed in
- Australia and overseas
- Privacy policy states identity verification and screening run in the EU and US, AI drafting, payments and error monitoring in the US, and email in the US and Japan; the verification provider is not named (sub-processor list on request).
- Fields established
- 23/31
- of the tracked fields, from public sources. Checked 8 October 2026.
- Other platforms for Accounting
- Other platforms for Real estate
- Other platforms for Legal
- Other platforms for Conveyancing
Pricing detail: Solo $49/mo +GST (2 users). Starter $149/mo +GST (10 users). Professional $299/mo +GST (25 users, $135/mo credit). Enterprise contact sales. Per check: KYC $8.00, KYB $5 + variable, company extract $25.00, related-party screening $1.00, standalone screening $5.00, AI map extraction $3 beyond allowance. 14-day free trial plus $15 signup credit.
Consider ClearAML if you need...
- Risk assessment
- Customer due diligence
- Know-your-business (entity checks)
- Beneficial ownership and control
- Electronic identity verification
You may need another product if...
- a named practice-management or accounting integration is a must-have
Only confirmed limitations are listed. Anything unestablished is shown as “needs confirmation” below, not as a weakness.
Capabilities
All 31 tracked fields are shown — whether or not we could establish them. “Not obtained” means the current public record does not confirm it; it is not a “no”.
| Dimension | Fields agreed | Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Program & governance | 3 of 5 | Moderate |
| CDD & entity work | 3 of 5 | Moderate |
| Identity | 3 of 3 | Broad |
| Screening & monitoring | 2 of 4 | Moderate |
| Tranche 2 operations | 1 of 7 | Limited |
| Reporting & control | 3 of 4 | Broad |
| Evidence & extensibility | 1 of 3 | Limited |
Tickmark legend
- Agreedagreed to public source
- Queriedqueried — conditional or limited
- Not obtainednot obtained — not a 'no'
- Not agreednot agreed — confirmed absent
Program & governance
Stated as audit exports "ready for routine reviews, independent evaluations, or unannounced inspections" — support for an evaluation, not the evaluation itself.
CDD & entity work
Identity verification
Marketing states identity verification runs through the DVS; the terms of service describe it as reached "via an authorised gateway", meaning access is through a provider rather than direct.
Screening & monitoring
Product docs describe transactions logged manually (or per client) and auto-flagged against two configurable thresholds (cash default $10,000, any transaction default $50,000); pattern-based rules are not described.
Reporting & control
Product docs state SMR, TTR, IFTI and CBM reports are exported as a batch XML ZIP for upload through AUSTRAC Online (requires the AUSTRAC Enrolment ID); no schema version is stated.
Evidence & extensibility
Tranche 2 operations
Vendor states every client is scored on four dimensions, one of which is the risk of the designated service being provided; the product docs describe profession-specific questionnaires per service line, and no separate risk rating per designated service is described.
Product docs set client review cycles by risk rating (Low 36, Medium 24, High 12 months) and marketing claims automatic re-assessment triggers on material changes; a re-review triggered by a new designated service is not described.
Product docs track the AML/CTF program review date (auto-added on publish, emailed 30 days before and when overdue), let officers add custom calendar events, remind about the 14-day AUSTRAC compliance-officer notification and include an Annual Compliance Report assistant; risk assessment review, governing-body reporting and independent evaluation dates are not tracked automatically.
Product docs state every published program version is kept (superseded versions move to a Decommissioned tab, retained 7 years), and each client's risk assessments are kept as a dated history with past assessments preserving the questions they were scored with.
Product docs offer an Escalate decision on screening matches and automatic EDD escalation for high-risk assessments, but do not describe how an escalation is routed to the compliance officer or how its outcome is notified back.
Vendor homepage states the dashboard shows document expiry dates; no alert for expired documents or active engagements is described in the docs.
Vendor changelog describes Inter-Firm Connections that send a complete client compliance record to a connected firm; the vendor does not describe this as a reliance arrangement, and no inbound request workflow is described.
Known limitations
Recorded from the provider's own published material and public records, with the same care as the capabilities.
- Verification charged per check on all tiers; only Professional and above include a monthly credit.
Not established
Fields the current public record could not confirm. Treat as questions to ask — not as absences.
Integrations
No integrations are named on the provider's own site. A generic API is not the same as a named integration — confirm before assuming anything connects.
Find platforms that integrate with your systemsWhere this comes from
AML Finder does not maintain a separate set of vendor claims. These facts come from AML Directory Australia's structured, source-checked records.
- Pricing page (opens in a new tab)Checked 25 August 2026
- ABR record (opens in a new tab)Checked 25 August 2026
- Staff training page (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Audit trail page (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- FAQ hub (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- About page (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Tranche 2 guide (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Terms of service (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Privacy policy (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- AML risk assessment software page (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: Risk assessments (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: AML/CTF program (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: PEP and sanctions screening (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Homepage (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Product updates (May 2026) (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: Transaction monitoring (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: AUSTRAC reporting (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Security and data page (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
Alternatives to ClearAML
Tell us what you want to change — lower cost, DVS, integrations, reporting — and we’ll re-rank the dataset.
Compared with
Same product type, overlapping sectors or similar starting price.
Questions about ClearAML
Does ClearAML support DVS?
Does ClearAML offer automated (bank-style) transaction monitoring?
Does ClearAML support ECDD?
Does ClearAML support accounting firms?
Does ClearAML publish pricing?
What type of AML product is ClearAML?
Not sure ClearAML is the right fit?
Tell us what you need and we'll show your alignment with ClearAML alongside every other product in the dataset.
See if ClearAML fits my firm