SubjectTwo records, worked side by side
Records checked to8 October 2026
easyAML vs First AML
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
easyAML
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- $179.00/mo
- Evidence
- 74%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal
- Data residency
- australia
First AML
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 65%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing, Financial services
- Data residency
- australia
Choose easyAML when...
- AML/CTF program creation is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Program maintenance and review is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Staff training is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Adverse media screening is verified — First AML has not established it.
Choose First AML when...
- Enhanced due diligence is verified — easyAML has not established it.
- API access is verified — easyAML has not established it.
- Reliance CDD requests sent and received is verified — easyAML has not established it.
Where both fit
Risk assessmentCustomer due diligenceKnow-your-business (entity checks)Beneficial ownership and controlElectronic identity verificationBiometric liveness and face matchPEP and sanctions screeningOngoing customer monitoringEvidence pack exportEscalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recordedExpired document alerts
Biggest differences
| Field | easyAML | First AML |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | Verified | No |
| Program maintenance and review | Verified | Not established |
| Staff training | Verified | No |
| Enhanced due diligence | Not established | Verified |
| Document Verification Service (DVS) access | Verified | Not established |
| Adverse media screening | Verified | Partial |
| Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) | Verified | Not established |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | Verified | Not established |
| API access | Not established | Verified |
| Program obligations calendar | Partial | Not established |
| Versioned AML program and CDD records | Verified | Partial |
| Reliance CDD requests sent and received | No | Verified |
| Named integrations | 0 named | 12 named |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
easyAMLFirst AML
- AML/CTF program creation Agreed Not agreed
- Program maintenance and review Agreed Not obtained
- Risk assessment Agreed Agreed
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Not obtained Not obtained
- Staff training Agreed Not agreed
CDD & entity work
easyAMLFirst AML
- Customer due diligence Agreed Agreed
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Agreed Agreed
- Beneficial ownership and control Agreed Agreed
- Enhanced due diligence Not obtained Agreed
- Reliance arrangements Not obtained Not obtained
Identity verification
easyAMLFirst AML
- Electronic identity verification Agreed Agreed
- Biometric liveness and face match Agreed Agreed
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Agreed Not obtained
Screening & monitoring
easyAMLFirst AML
- PEP and sanctions screening Agreed Agreed
- Adverse media screening Agreed Queried
- Ongoing customer monitoring Agreed Agreed
- Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) Agreed Not obtained
Reporting & control
easyAMLFirst AML
- Suspicious matter report workflow Agreed Not obtained
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Not obtained Not obtained
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Not obtained Not obtained
- Threshold transaction reporting Not obtained Not obtained
Evidence & extensibility
easyAMLFirst AML
- Evidence pack export Agreed Agreed
- Immutable audit log Not obtained Not obtained
- API access Not obtained Agreed
Tranche 2 operations
easyAMLFirst AML
- Risk assessed per designated service Queried Queried
- Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk Queried Queried
- Program obligations calendar Queried Not obtained
- Versioned AML program and CDD records Agreed Queried
- Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recorded Agreed Agreed
- Expired document alerts Agreed Agreed
- Reliance CDD requests sent and received Not agreed Agreed
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Independent evaluation support (s84)Enhanced due diligenceReliance arrangementsAUSTRAC SMR XML exportTipping-off controls (s123)Threshold transaction reportingImmutable audit logAPI access
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 8 October 2026. Source records: easyAML on AML Directory · First AML on AML Directory