First AML vs SimpleAML
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
Product A
First AML
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 58%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing, Financial services
- Data residency
- mixed
Product B
SimpleAML
Local register
- Entry price
- $0.00/mo
- Evidence
- 54%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Conveyancing
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose First AML when...
- Customer due diligence is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Know-your-business (entity checks) is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Beneficial ownership and control is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Enhanced due diligence is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Electronic identity verification is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
Choose SimpleAML when...
- Staff training is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Tipping-off controls (s123) is verified — First AML has not established it.
Where both fit
Risk assessment
Biggest differences
| Field | First AML | SimpleAML |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | No | Partial |
| Staff training | No | Verified |
| Customer due diligence | Verified | Partial |
| Know-your-business (entity checks) | Verified | No |
| Beneficial ownership and control | Verified | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | Verified | Not established |
| Electronic identity verification | Verified | No |
| Biometric liveness and face match | Verified | Not established |
| PEP and sanctions screening | Verified | No |
| Adverse media screening | Partial | Not established |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | Verified | Not established |
| Transaction monitoring | Not established | No |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | Not established | Partial |
| AUSTRAC SMR XML export | Not established | No |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
- AML/CTF program creation No Partial
- Program maintenance and review Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Risk assessment Verified Verified
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
- Staff training No Verified
CDD & entity work
- Customer due diligence Verified Partial
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Verified No
- Beneficial ownership and control Verified Needs confirmation
- Enhanced due diligence Verified Needs confirmation
- Reliance arrangements Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Identity verification
- Electronic identity verification Verified No
- Biometric liveness and face match Verified Needs confirmation
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Screening & monitoring
- PEP and sanctions screening Verified No
- Adverse media screening Partial Needs confirmation
- Ongoing customer monitoring Verified Needs confirmation
- Transaction monitoring Needs confirmation No
Reporting & control
- Suspicious matter report workflow Needs confirmation Partial
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Needs confirmation No
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Needs confirmation Verified
- Threshold transaction reporting Needs confirmation Needs confirmation
Evidence & extensibility
- Evidence pack export Verified No
- Immutable audit log Needs confirmation No
- API access Verified Needs confirmation
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewIndependent evaluation support (s84)Reliance arrangementsDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessTransaction monitoringSuspicious matter report workflowAUSTRAC SMR XML exportTipping-off controls (s123)
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 25 August 2026. Source records: First AML on AML Directory · SimpleAML on AML Directory