SubjectTwo records, worked side by side
Records checked to8 October 2026
First AML vs SimpleAML
There is no universal winner. The question is which kinds of buyer should prefer which. These pages are built from the same source-checked data as every other page on AML Finder.
First AML
Full AML/CTF platform
- Entry price
- On application
- Evidence
- 65%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Legal, Conveyancing, Financial services
- Data residency
- australia
SimpleAML
Local register
- Entry price
- $0.00/mo
- Evidence
- 55%
- Marketed to
- Accounting, Real estate, Conveyancing
- Data residency
- Not established
Choose First AML when...
- Customer due diligence is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Know-your-business (entity checks) is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Beneficial ownership and control is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Enhanced due diligence is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
- Electronic identity verification is verified — SimpleAML has not established it.
Choose SimpleAML when...
- Staff training is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Tipping-off controls (s123) is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Risk assessed per designated service is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk is verified — First AML has not established it.
- Versioned AML program and CDD records is verified — First AML has not established it.
Where both fit
Risk assessment
Biggest differences
| Field | First AML | SimpleAML |
|---|---|---|
| AML/CTF program creation | No | Partial |
| Staff training | No | Verified |
| Customer due diligence | Verified | Partial |
| Know-your-business (entity checks) | Verified | No |
| Beneficial ownership and control | Verified | Not established |
| Enhanced due diligence | Verified | Not established |
| Electronic identity verification | Verified | No |
| Biometric liveness and face match | Verified | Not established |
| PEP and sanctions screening | Verified | No |
| Adverse media screening | Partial | Not established |
| Ongoing customer monitoring | Verified | Not established |
| Suspicious matter report workflow | Not established | Partial |
| AUSTRAC SMR XML export | Not established | No |
| Tipping-off controls (s123) | Not established | Verified |
Capabilities, section by section
Program & governance
First AMLSimpleAML
- AML/CTF program creation Not agreed Queried
- Program maintenance and review Not obtained Not obtained
- Risk assessment Agreed Agreed
- Independent evaluation support (s84) Not obtained Not obtained
- Staff training Not agreed Agreed
CDD & entity work
First AMLSimpleAML
- Customer due diligence Agreed Queried
- Know-your-business (entity checks) Agreed Not agreed
- Beneficial ownership and control Agreed Not obtained
- Enhanced due diligence Agreed Not obtained
- Reliance arrangements Not obtained Not obtained
Identity verification
First AMLSimpleAML
- Electronic identity verification Agreed Not agreed
- Biometric liveness and face match Agreed Not obtained
- Document Verification Service (DVS) access Not obtained Not obtained
Screening & monitoring
First AMLSimpleAML
- PEP and sanctions screening Agreed Not agreed
- Adverse media screening Queried Not obtained
- Ongoing customer monitoring Agreed Not obtained
- Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules) Not obtained Not obtained
Reporting & control
First AMLSimpleAML
- Suspicious matter report workflow Not obtained Queried
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export Not obtained Not agreed
- Tipping-off controls (s123) Not obtained Agreed
- Threshold transaction reporting Not obtained Not obtained
Evidence & extensibility
First AMLSimpleAML
- Evidence pack export Agreed Not agreed
- Immutable audit log Not obtained Not agreed
- API access Agreed Not obtained
Tranche 2 operations
First AMLSimpleAML
- Risk assessed per designated service Queried Agreed
- Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk Queried Agreed
- Program obligations calendar Not obtained Queried
- Versioned AML program and CDD records Queried Agreed
- Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recorded Agreed Queried
- Expired document alerts Agreed Not obtained
- Reliance CDD requests sent and received Agreed Not obtained
Unknowns to confirm
Not established for at least one of these two — ask before relying on it.
Program maintenance and reviewIndependent evaluation support (s84)Reliance arrangementsDocument Verification Service (DVS) accessAutomated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules)Suspicious matter report workflowAUSTRAC SMR XML exportTipping-off controls (s123)
Which one fits your requirements?
These two are compared on every field we track. Tell us what matters to you and we’ll recalculate this comparison against your own requirements.
Tell us what matters to youProvider facts checked through 8 October 2026. Source records: First AML on AML Directory · SimpleAML on AML Directory